SEPTEMBER 2023 RELEASES
September 2023 Releases
Why “Sounding Nice” Fails: Engineering Empathy in AI Agents
A customer says, quietly, “I’m… kind of overwhelmed. I don’t even know where to start.”
Your AI agent replies: “Great. Please confirm your date of birth.”
And just like that, you’ve lost them.
Not because the agent was “rude” or lacked empathetic language.
You lost them because the system moved to the conversational step without earning permission to proceed.
That’s the central misunderstanding in most AI deployments: teams treat empathy like as a copy problem (tone) when it’s actually a systems problem, governed by timing, state awareness, decision logic, guardrails, and recovery paths.
In this guide, I’ll break down what empathetic AI means in operational terms, why “sounding nice” fails, and the framework we use to design agents that maintain trust through customer confusion, hesitation, interruptions, and compliance checkpoints.
And yes—empathy matters because it drives outcomes. In one healthcare intake scenario, we saw meaningful drop-off reduction at a required compliance moment after redesigning the agent’s approach to acknowledgement, framing, and permissioning.
But empathy has a second edge: when teams chase “humanness” without guardrails, they risk creating agents that go off-script, violate compliance requirements, or (in one infamous case) start swearing at customers.
In this guide, you’ll learn how to build an agent that balances empathy with control, and drives real results in production.
What “empathetic AI” actually means
Empathetic AI isn’t just defined by “warm language.” It’s a set of behaviors that protect the contact’s emotional state and still moves the core task forward.
Operationally, an empathetic agent does three things consistently:
- Recognizes emotional signals (i.e., confusion, anxiety, frustration, embarrassment, vulnerability).
- Stabilizes the conversation (acknowledge, clarify, and set expectations).
- Re-enters the task with permission (providing, not forcing, a clear next step).
Most real customer conversations don’t fail on the happy path. They fail at the edges:
- “Wait, why do you need that?”
- “I’m not comfortable sharing this.”
- “I don’t understand what you mean.”
- “I’m driving.”
- “I’ve been trying to fix this for weeks.”
- “I’m scared this won’t be covered.”
Empathy is how you keep the conversation alive long enough to help—empathetic agents optimize for continuation and trust, not just containment.
The myth: empathy is rarely about tone
Many teams ship a “robotic” agent, realize contacts hate it, and then try to fix the problem by making it “warmer”—adding empathetic phrases, selecting a friendlier voice, or tweaking prompts—without changing the underlying system behavior.
Those changes can help at the margins, but they don’t address the core failure modes:
- Identity mismatch: the agent doesn’t act like it has responsibility.
- Context blindness: it treats every contact like a cooperative form-filler.
- Timing failures: it advances the flow before the contact is ready.
- No recovery path: it can’t pause, repair, and re-enter the task when things break down.
- Missing guardrails: it tries to be “human” by improvising—exactly what regulated contexts prohibit.
Empathy isn’t a coat of paint. It’s the structure of the building.
Voice vs chat: same brain, different empathy
Voice and chat require different empathy models, even when sharing the same underlying system.
Voice: pressure and timing
Voice is real-time. Contacts interrupt, ramble, and whisper. They pause the conversation to talk to others in the room. They lose signal. They change their mind mid-sentence.
Empathy in voice is heavily shaped by pacing and turn-taking:
- Micro-pauses before asking sensitive questions
- Not talking over the contact
- Treating interruptions as signals, not errors
- Using short confirmations so the contact feels heard
A Voice AI agent can correctly follow conversational steps and still feel unnatural if it rushes between them.
Chat/SMS: structure and consistency
Chat has different constraints:
- Formatting is the interface.
- Ambiguity lives longer (the contact can re-read confusing messages).
- Drift compounds over time, making inconsistencies visible in the conversation log.
Empathy in chat often looks like:
- Short, clear blocks
- One acknowledgment sentence
- One next question
- Consistent restatement of constraints
Same underlying intelligence. Different failure modes.
Empathy across the stack
If you’re building Voice AI agents, empathy isn’t located in one place. It’s distributed across:
- Speech-to-text (STT): what the system interprets the contact said, including hesitation, corrections, or uncertainty
- LLM (reasoning and policy): how the agent decides what to do next
- Text-to-speech (TTS): how the decision is delivered via pacing, tone, and responsiveness
If any layer breaks, empathy breaks.
Chat follows the same idea with different layers:
- Model output
- Structure and formatting
- Memory and consistency across turns
This is why just tweaking the prompt often fails. You can’t prompt your way out of a broken turn-taking system.
The 5 levers of empathetic AI:
We rely on the framework below because it’s enforceable. It doesn’t rely on “good vibes” or stylistic updates.
.png)
1. Identity as responsibility (not role-play)
Most agents have an identity like: “You are a helpful assistant.” That’s not enough.
An empathetic agent needs identity defined as explicit responsibilities:
- Protect the user’s emotional state during sensitive moments.
- Be patient through confusion and repetition.
- Explain why information is being requested when stakes are high (privacy, payment, eligibility, medical info).
- Never advance the flow without consent after a hesitation signal.
When identity is framed as responsibility, “empathy” becomes a policy the agent must follow.
2. Context modeling: design for the real customers
If your agent assumes a calm, cooperative contact, it will fail on real ones.
Instead, model common states as expected contexts:
- Confused
- Skeptical
- Tired
- Distracted
- Embarrassed
- Anxious
- Frustrated
Then define behaviors for each:
- Confused: restate in simpler words + offer options
- Skeptical: explain why you’re asking + offer a choice (continue / talk to human)
- Anxious: slow down + confirm you’re going step-by-step
If you don’t model these states, the agent will interpret them as obstacles, and contacts will feel it.
3. Flow control that respects emotional state
This is the biggest difference between robotic and empathetic systems.
Robotic agents advance the workflow by default:
“Thanks for sharing. Before we continue, federal policy requires me to read you a brief privacy statement and then we’ll jump right back in. I’ll begin reading now.”
Empathetic agents regulate the flow based on user state:
“Thank you for sharing. Insurance can feel really overwhelming, especially when you’re dealing with multiple health issues and appointment scheduling. Before I connect you, I just need to confirm a few details, does that sound okay?”
Flow control means resisting the urge to push the interaction forward after a hesitation signal, adding explicit gates around sensitive moments, and using permissioning (“Is it okay if we continue?”) before advancing. This is where drop-off is either prevented or guaranteed.
4. Guardrails that allow stabilization, then re-entry
In regulated workflows, you can’t let the agent “wing it.” But you also can’t force the agent to stay on rails so tightly that it steamrolls emotions.
The solution is controlled flexibility:
- Allow brief deviation for stabilization (acknowledge, clarify, reassure)
- Then re-enter the task with a clear next step
- Maintain compliance requirements throughout
This is the difference between empathetic systems and uncontrolled ones.
A real cautionary tale: there have been public incidents where customer-service chatbots went wildly off-script, swearing at customers and trash-talking the company. You don’t need to experience that to understand the cost implications.
The point isn’t to avoid being human. It’s to be human within boundaries.
5. Style and tone as the final layer
Tone matters, but it’s not the foundation.
Once the agent makes the right decision (pause, explain, permission), tone simply delivers it calm, clear, brief, and respectful.
Tone cannot override policy. If the flow is wrong, warm words make it worse.
The “expected scenario”: the privacy statement moment
In healthcare, insurance, and financial services, a familiar pattern emerges. A required script—privacy disclosure, recording notice, consent—is introduced, and customer behavior shifts.
They get nervous.
They ask “Why?”
They say “I don’t want to do this.”
They go silent.
A robotic agent treats this as noncompliance and pushes harder. An empathetic agent treats it as a trust checkpoint.
Empathetic by design in that moment includes:
- Acknowledging the discomfort without dramatizing it
- Framing the purpose in plain language
- Offering control (continue, ask questions, or transfer)
- Requesting permission before proceeding
Sample phrasing: “Totally fair to ask. This statement is here to protect your privacy and explain how your information is used. I am required to read it by law, but I can explain any part of it before we continue, or connect you to a person, but they will still have to read it as well—what would you prefer?”
That’s not “nice.” That’s structural.
Voice-specific empathy techniques
If you’re building Voice AI agents, the empathy-building tactics below aren’t cosmetic, they’re essential.
Pick the right voice: select voices based on audience and context, using deeper voices for contacts with hearing difficulties, calm and neutral voices for longer or complex flows, and warmer, younger voices for standard interactions.
Tweak pacing and responsiveness: slow slightly for sensitive use cases or older audiences, insert micro-pauses before long statements or when requesting private information, and avoid instant turn-taking that feels like interruption.
Treat interruptions as meaning: interpret interruptions as indicators of confusion, anxiety, urgency, or disagreement rather than errors, and design the agent to yield and repair instead of forcing continuation (e.g., “Got it—go ahead. What’s on your mind?”).
Use the “Acknowledge → Frame → Ask permission” pattern: apply this pattern ahead of high-friction moments such as privacy or compliance disclosures, payments, eligibility denials, or long holds to preserve trust while continuing the interaction.
Chat-specific empathy techniques
Chat empathy is largely about structure.
Design for structure: treat formatting as the interface, using short blocks and explicit steps rather than dense paragraphs.
Break messages into components: lead with a one-line acknowledgment, follow with a single clear next question, and include optional choices when relevant. For example, “That makes sense. This can be confusing. Quick question so I can help: are you trying to reschedule, cancel, or check availability?”
Optimize for brevity without dismissiveness: avoid long explanations; one sentence of acknowledgment is sufficient when the next step is clear and concrete.
Prioritize consistency over charm: maintain stable constraints across the thread, and restate key rules when necessary—what the agent can and can’t do, what information is required, and what will happen next.
How to measure whether empathy is working
Since empathy is architectural, you can measure it.
Start with the moments where agents most often fail: privacy/compliance statements, payment collection, eligibility denial, long wait times or hold messages, and scheduling constraints.
Then track:
- Drop-offs at hard moments (the best signal)
- Repair rate after interruptions (does the contact continue?)
- Repeat-question rate (a proxy for confusion)
- Escalation patterns (when appropriate)
- Sentiment shifts around known friction points
In one healthcare intake scenario, redesigning the privacy-statement moment with acknowledgment, framing, and permissioning significantly reduced drop-off at that exact step.
You don’t need perfect sentiment analysis to learn this. You need visibility into where contacts disengage and whether the system successfully recovers.
The iteration loop: how empathy is engineered
Don’t try to make the agent “empathetic everywhere.” Instead, start here:
- Ship a baseline flow that works on the happy path.
- Identify the top 3 abandonment moments.
- Patch those moments using the five levers: identify responsibility, context, modeling, flow control, guardrails and re-entry, and tone.
- Retest with real conversations.
- Repeat.
Empathy is not a sprint. It’s an operating system update.
Closing: empathy is architectural
Robotic AI fails because it treats humans like form fields.
Empathetic AI succeeds when it treats the conversation like a relationship with stakes, where trust must be earned, confusion must be handled, compliance must be respected, and control remains with the user.
Empathy doesn’t come from wording alone. It’s designed through five levers:
- Identity as responsibility
- Context modeling
- Flow control
- Guardrails that stabilize, then re-enter
- Tone as the final lever
Schedule a demo today to see how Regal can design an empathetic agent for your use-case that drives retention and conversion.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does "empathetic AI” mean?
Empathy shows up differently between voice and chat because the interaction constraints are different. In voice, empathy is expressed through pacing, turn-taking, and handling interruptions naturally in real time. In chat, empathy comes through clear structure, explicit acknowledgments, and consistency over time so the conversation remains easy to follow.
How does empathy show up differently between voice and chat?
Empathy shows up differently between voice and chat because the interaction constraints are different. In voice, empathy is expressed through pacing, turn-taking, and handling interruptions naturally in real time. In chat, empathy comes through clear structure, explicit acknowledgments, and consistency over time so the conversation remains easy to follow.
Can I add empathy to my agent by just adjusting the prompt?
No, your agent’s empathy depends on multiple layers working together: speech-to-text (how well hesitation or corrections are interpreted), the LLM (how decisions are made), and text-to-speech (how responses are delivered through tone, pacing, and timing). If any of these layers break, empathy breaks too.
w can I measure whether empathy in my agent is working?
To measure for success, focus on behavior, not just wording. Measure drop-offs at high-friction moments (like privacy statements or payment collection), repair rates after interruptions, repeat-question rates, escalation patterns, and sentiment shifts around known pain points. These signals show whether contacts stay engaged and whether the system successfully recovers when interactions get hard.
Founded in 2020, Regal is an enterprise voice AI agent platform for contact centers. Regal helps businesses build, deploy, and manage autonomous AI agents across sales, support, and operations teams.
Latest Blog Posts
.png)
Voice AI Customization 101: Settings That Work Best
Learn how to configure your AI Voice Agent for real performance. This guide covers the most important voice settings in Regal, what ranges top brands use in production, and how adjusting speed, tone, and responsiveness impact cost, containment, and overall customer experience.
.png)
.png)
.png)
%20(2).png)
.png)
Pinpoint Critical Knowledge Base Gaps with Regal Improve
Customer conversations are inherently dynamic, and Regal Improve’s Knowledge Base Coverage tracks changes in retrieval performance over time and at scale. This makes it easy to verify that KB updates increase coverage and if your documentation is keeping up with evolving customer requests.
November 2025 Releases
November's releases make it easier to scale your transfer-heavy call flows, with new tools that align dialer pacing to downstream agent capacity and streamline complex handoffs. You’ll also see improved post-call workflow accuracy, with reliable data extraction and disposition outcomes driven by LLM configurability and earlier validation.
How to Make Voice AI Agents Think and Act Like Your Best Human Agents
See how modern AI voice agents can match your best human reps by building five core capabilities into every call: spatial awareness, temporal awareness, sensory perception, proactive retrieval, and real action-taking. This post breaks down what each pillar means in practice and how they turn voice AI from a conversational bot into a fully empowered operator.
.png)
Teaching Voice AI to Behave: Prompting Principles Every Parent Already Knows
Building a great AI voice agent isn’t so different from parenting a five-year-old: clarity, examples, and structure make all the difference. This post breaks down proven prompting principles—from positive framing and persona design to conversational guardrails—that help AI agents sound natural, stay on task, and follow directions every time.
.png)
.png)
How Kin Insurance & a360inc Achieved Faster Outreach and Better Customer Experiences with AI Agents
In this fireside chat, Regal Co-Founder & CEO Alex Levin sits down with Kin Insurance’s Austin Ewell and a360inc’s Henry Davidson to share how their organizations are using AI agents to transform outreach, customer experience, and operational efficiency. They discuss real-world deployments—from qualification and human agent handoffs to complex negotiation workflows—break down the results, and offer practical guidance for leaders adopting AI agents at scale.
.webp)
.png)
October 2025 Releases
October’s releases give you deeper structure and insight across your AI operations—from designing predictable, multi-state conversation flows and delivering seamless human handoffs to uncovering performance insights and strengthening your agents’ knowledge for continuous improvement.
.png)
.png)
.png)
Single vs Multi-State: How to Pick the Right AI Agent for the Job
Learn about the difference between single-state and multi-state AI agents, and how each impacts speed, scale, and reliability. Discover when simplicity is enough and when enterprise workflows demand structured orchestration, so you can choose the right design for your use case.
Automatically Evaluate Test Suites with Simulations
Discover how you can use Simulations to evaluate scenario-specific conversational flows that pinpoint AI Agent failures before launch. Speed up regression testing, validate prompts, knowledge bases, and custom actions at scale, and deploy reliable AI Agents with confidence.
The Rise of Voice AI Agents: Real-World Deployments Across the Enterprise
In this AI4 fireside chat, Regal.ai COO Sahil Mehta and TaskUs CCO Jarrod Johnson explore how enterprise organizations are deploying voice AI agents across customer experience, support, and sales. They share real-world deployments, discuss quality and ROI trade-offs, and outline best practices for aligning operations and product teams when adopting AI agents at scale.
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
August 2025 Releases
New features include automated test evaluations, the Regal Improve insights dashboard, PII-safe recording actions, 25 ultra-realistic voice options, bulk Knowledge Base URL upload, and expanded quiet hours compliance—designed to accelerate iteration, improve agent performance, and safeguard customer trust.
%20(1).png)
Apple iOS 26 Caller Screening: An Enterprise Guide
Apple’s iOS 26 introduces new call-screening controls that will reshape outbound performance. This guide explains what’s changing, how adoption may impact enterprise contact centers, and the proactive steps leaders can take now to protect answer rates and customer trust.
RAG Hygiene: How to Scale and Maintain AI Agent Knowledge
Learn how to maintain a clean, reliable RAG system for AI Agents. Discover best practices for structuring source docs, chunking content, titling for retrieval, avoiding redundancy, and keeping knowledge bases fresh to ensure accurate, scalable performance.
Announcing Regal + Rime: Human-Like Voices at Enterprise Scale
Regal is partnering with Rime to deliver ultra-realistic, emotionally nuanced AI voices for enterprise contact centers. Discover new voice options that capture human qualities like pacing, resonance, and subtle expression, and learn how Rime’s technology powers conversations that build trust at scale.
.png)
%20(1).png)
.png)
The RAG Playbook: Structuring Scalable Knowledge Bases for Reliable AI Agents
Learn how to structure a knowledge base that keeps AI Agents accurate and on-script. Discover why human-style KBs fail, and apply best practices like single-topic chunking, concrete instructions, and explicit outcomes to reduce hallucinations and scale reliable RAG performance.
.png)
.png)
.png)
%20(1).png)
Announcing Regal + Cartesia: Expanding Voice Options for Enterprise AI
Regal is partnering with Cartesia to deliver ultra-low latency, high-fidelity AI voices for enterprise contact centers. Explore new voice options, hear them in action, and learn about Cartesia's industry-leading voice AI offerings.
.png)
.png)
Anatomy of an AI Voice: What Makes It Sound Human
This article outlines the core characteristics that influence how voice AI is perceived on live calls. From mechanical traits like speed and volume, to more emotional and conversational behaviors, we’re going to look at what those characteristics mean, why they matter, and how they impact your bottom line.
%20(1).png)
June 2025 Releases
June’s releases give you more control to test, improve, and scale AI agents—while also making life easier for human agent teams. From real-time debugging tools to capacity control and a floating Chrome extension, we’re unlocking faster workflows, better control, and stronger performance across the board.
.png)
Caller ID vs. CNAM vs. Branded Caller ID: What’s the Difference?
Caller ID, CNAM, and Branded Caller ID all help identify an incoming call and, therefore, increase call answer rates. Find out how they differ and how outbound phone sales teams can utilize each to reach prospects and customers effectively.
.png)
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
%20(1).webp)
.avif)
.png)
The Automated Phone System Revolution: Why 73% of Enterprises Are Getting It Wrong (And How to Get It Right)
Explore how automated phone systems are transforming enterprise communication strategies. Learn how to avoid common pitfalls, optimize customer journeys, and achieve ROI through strategic deployment across industries like healthcare, insurance, and education.
%20(1).png)
.png)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
How are Generative AI Voice Agents Different from AI Voice Assistants?
When it comes to comparing AI Agents vs. AI Assistants, Siri & Alexa handle simple tasks, but Gen AI Voice Agents—like Regal’s AI Phone Agent—drive real business impact with human-like conversations, automation, and seamless integration.
.webp)
.webp)
%20(1).webp)
7 Best Use Cases for AI Voice Agents in Your Contact Center
As AI technology continues to evolve, the use cases for AI Voice Agents in contact centers will only increase. By answering these six key questions, you can identify where AI agents fit best today in your contact center and plan for future integrations.
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
%20(1).webp)
.webp)
%202.webp)
AI Agents for Education: 8 Use Cases for More Meaningful Student Outcomes
AI Agents for Education are transforming student engagement—boosting enrollment, improving retention, and making support more human. Discover 8 game-changing use cases that free up your staff while delivering better student outcomes.
Regal Named One of Forbes America’s Best Startup Employers 2025!
Regal is officially one of Forbes America’s Best Startup Employers 2025, ranking #164 out of 500. This recognition is a testament to our incredible team, our innovative work culture, and our unwavering commitment to advancing AI technology.
AI in Education: The Future of Student Engagement & Enrollment
AI in education is helping to streamline admissions, automate student engagement, and enhance higher ed outreach. Discover key education technology trends to boost enrollment and learn why automated student engagement tools are the future.
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
Treat your customers like royalty
Ready to see Regal in action?
Book a personalized demo.
Thank you! Click here if you are not redirected.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
