SEPTEMBER 2023 RELEASES
September 2023 Releases
The LLM Matchmaking Guide for Enterprise-Grade AI Agents
Your choice of LLM is an important architectural decision when building a Voice AI Agent.
The model you select determines how well the agent interprets customer input, follows instructions, handles ambiguity, and executes downstream actions like qualification, scheduling, or custom workflows.
While most agents begin with OpenAI’s GPT-4.0 Mini (the default for new builds) some use cases demand more conversational nuance, memory, or logical complexity than Mini-class models can reliably support.
This guide outlines the capabilities, trade-offs, and real-world applications of every model currently supported in Regal.
Whether you're optimizing for low-latency, prompt compliance, memory retention, or expressive output, each model behaves differently under load and in production call flows. We'll walk through how to align your model selection with your technical requirements and business objectives, and when it's worth testing or upgrading to a different LLM.
Why Your LLM Matters
Your choice of LLM impacts both cost and performance, especially at scale.
Selecting the wrong model can result in degraded agent performance, whether through hallucinated outputs, broken function calls, or unnecessary latency. Conversely, a well-matched model can materially improve task resolution rates, reduce fallbacks, and expand the range of calls your agent can handle autonomously.
And then, of course, there’s the cost of each model.
The benefit of a platform like Regal is that it makes model experimentation low-risk and reversible. You can test different LLMs at your own risk, and use a variety of LLMs for agents across different call types.
In other words, you can find the right cost-to-performance ratio for any and every use case. The goal isn’t to use the cheapest or most powerful model by default, it’s to use the right one for the job.
Choosing the Right LLM for Voice AI Agents
Models Available in Regal
When to Use OpenAI Models
OpenAI models are the most widely used for Regal AI Agents because they strike the right balance between cost, speed, and conversational capability. They provide a good performance-to-cost ratio across common contact center workflows.
But not all OpenAI models behave the same.
Within the 4.x family, there are important differences in reasoning ability, conversational tone, and function-calling reliability.
Below is a breakdown of when to use each OpenAI model supported in Regal, based on your AI Agent’s complexity and required behavior.
GPT-4.0 Mini
Best for: Fast, low-cost conversations that follow a structured and predictable script.
GPT-4.0 Mini is highly efficient for task types that require minimal reasoning and no memory retention. It performs best in tightly scoped flows where the contact’s responses are expected and the agent's behavior is well defined by the prompt.
GPT-4.0 Mini generally offers the most efficient performance for structured, predictable flows. It is the default model in Regal, with roughly 60% of all Voice AI Agents in the platform using it.
Use GPT-4.0 Mini when:
You’re running short, highly structured calls with limited branching—typically under 15 conversational steps—and where the agent is executing a predefined script with minimal variability.
Common examples include outbound lead confirmations, fixed-format qualification calls, and collections workflows that follow a rigid compliance sequence. It’s also suitable for contact scenarios where latency or cost are a key constraint and logic complexity is low.
Strengths:
- Fastest model available in Regal’s platform.
- Most cost-efficient for high-volume task handling.
- Performs well with clearly written, deterministic prompts.
Limitations:
- Reasoning capabilities, especially with conditional logic or variable phrasing.
GPT-4.1 Mini
Best for: Slightly more dynamic calls where turn-taking or light branching is required.
In terms of capability, this model sits between GPT-4o Mini and the more advanced models. It’s better at handling variation and light logic than 4o Mini, but still fast and cost-effective.
Use GPT-4.1 Mini when:
GPT-4.1 Mini is a good fit when your call flow includes conditional logic, follow-up paths, or rerouting behavior that requires the agent to make decisions based on earlier answers in the conversation.
It performs well in scenarios where branching logic is present but not deeply recursive, such as Medicare eligibility screening with yes/no responses, appointment rescheduling with fixed options, and multi-step qualification calls that require fallback paths.
Strengths:
- Improved function calling and more reliable structured output.
- Better parsing of customer intent when compared to 4o Mini.
- Still relatively fast and affordable.
Limitations:
- Can hit reasoning limits on highly branched or long calls.
- Less nuanced than full 4.1 or 4o in conversational tone.
GPT-4o
Best for: Conversational experiences that prioritize tone, engagement, and expressive language.
GPT-4o offers a noticeable jump in conversational quality over mini models. It was designed to handle natural language more fluidly, with better control over prosody and variation in phrasing. It’s an ideal model for flows where the agent’s tone and ability to “improvise” make a measurable difference in customer outcomes.
Use GPT-4o when:
Your agent is expected to handle open-ended dialogue, shift tone based on customer sentiment, or build rapport through dynamic phrasing.
Use cases like inbound sales calls, support triage, and branded voice agents benefit from 4o’s natural dialogue capabilities. It also tolerates messier input more gracefully than GPT-4.1 Mini, making it more resilient to unpredictable customer behavior.
Strengths:
- Most expressive and human-like output of any OpenAI model.
- Strong performance in open-ended and semi-structured conversations.
- Handles intent shifts and informal language more naturally.
Limitations:
- Slightly less consistent with structured logic or function execution compared to GPT-4.1.
- Higher cost and latency than mini models.
- Can be overly verbose if prompts aren’t tightly scoped.
GPT-4.1
Best for: Complex, action-heavy flows that require precision, accuracy, and structured decisioning.
GPT-4.1 is Regal’s most reliable OpenAI model for deterministic task handling. It’s the preferred choice when your agent needs to call multiple custom actions, follow complex logic trees, or manage workflows with nested conditionals.
Its structured output is easier to control and test, especially in production environments where consistency matters.
Use GPT-4.1 when:
Your call involves chaining multiple actions together (i.e. a set of API calls to update a custom CRM), handling variable inputs across 10+ turns, or performing tasks that require mathematical reasoning or eligibility logic.
Common examples include detailed scheduling flows, custom quoting, and dynamic routing based on profile attributes. GPT-4.1 is also highly effective for prompt patterns that rely on precision formatting or strict logic gates.
Strengths:
- Best function-calling consistency among OpenAI models.
- High accuracy in following structured prompts and logic-heavy flows.
- Excellent at resolving ambiguity through controlled clarification.
Limitations:
- Higher latency and token cost relative to mini models.
- Less conversational variation and tone richness compared to GPT-4o.
- Requires tight prompt construction to avoid overly rigid outputs.
OpenAI Models – Real-World Use Cases
When to Consider Claude Models
While most Regal agents start on OpenAI, there are real advantages to using Claude models, particularly in scenarios that demand strong memory, creative phrasing, or high resilience to edge cases.
Claude models, built by Anthropic, are known for their ability to reason over long contexts, stay grounded in prior conversation turns, and output language that feels polished and human, even in unpredictable flows.
Below is a breakdown of when and how to consider using Claude models in Regal.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Best for: Fast, expressive conversations with lightweight memory and stylistic polish.
Claude 3.5 Haiku performs well in scenarios that benefit from human-like phrasing and a bit of memory retention, but don’t require long context windows or complex decision trees.
Use Claude 3.5 Haiku when:
Your call is short to mid-length, with moderate personalization and moments where natural phrasing or variation improves the customer experience.
Examples include education or benefits onboarding calls, outbound application guidance, and light support flows that don’t involve decision trees or API-heavy logic. It can also be useful when the same agent is expected to interact across voice and SMS, thanks to its fluent multi-modal language generation.
Strengths:
- Natural, polished output that feels more “spoken” than generated.
- Handles slight variations in phrasing or tone better than OpenAI mini models.
- Supports short-term memory and dynamic summarization within a session.
Limitations:
- Limited support for complex branching logic or layered action sequences.
- Cannot maintain long-term memory across high-turn conversations.
- Slightly higher latency and cost than GPT-4.0 Mini without the same logic handling.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Best for: Long, unpredictable conversations that require memory, nuance, and synthesis.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet excels in memory-intensive scenarios where earlier answers must be referenced later in the call. It’s the best choice for workflows that involve summarization, complex triage, or emotionally sensitive phrasing.
Use Claude 3.7 Sonnet when:
Your AI Agent is handling inbound support or onboarding calls that span multiple topics, require data retention across 20+ turns, or involve compliance-sensitive messaging.
It’s particularly strong in industries like healthcare, financial services, or insurance, where the agent must synthesize information and restate it accurately while maintaining control over tone and privacy requirements.
Sonnet also performs well in recovery flows, where fallback logic relies on tracking previous failures or attempted alternative paths.
Strengths:
- Strongest long-context retention and memory of any model in Regal.
- High accuracy in summarizing and reusing previous inputs within the session.
- Consistent, measured tone in complex or sensitive domains.
Limitations:
- Highest latency and cost among supported models.
- Requires detailed prompt tuning to avoid verbosity or excessive hedging.
- May be overkill for structured, repetitive call flows where logic > memory.
Claude Models – Real-World Use Cases
Testing Before You Switch
Not every performance issue is a model issue. Before upgrading, focus on tuning the components around the LLM:
- Prompt structure: Simplify, clarify, or modularize your instructions.
- Fallback handling: Adjust how your agent recovers when responses are unclear or unexpected.
- Voice settings: Modify tone, responsiveness, or interruption sensitivity if timing or clarity is off.
- Knowledge base integration: Use RAG for deeper or dynamic content instead of overloading the prompt.
When to Test a New Model
If you’ve already optimized your flow and the agent still fails to retain earlier answers across turns, struggles with vague input or off-script customer behavior, or outputs phrasing that feels robotic or unnatural, it’s time to test an upgraded model.
Always test new models in live call environments with production-level volume: Even small changes in model behavior can affect latency, cost, and agent containment. Use A/B testing to quantify improvements before making a full switch.
Optimizing for Fit, Not Power
Model selection is not a one-time decision. As your AI Agent use cases evolve, from basic qualification to dynamic scheduling or multi-topic support, your LLM needs may shift accordingly.
Start with the model that fits your current complexity and budget. Optimize prompts, fallbacks, and workflows first. Then, if performance gaps remain, test higher-tier models that align with your requirements for memory, logic, or conversational quality.
Regal’s platform makes it easy to switch, compare, and iterate without rebuilding your agent from scratch. And we’ll work with you at every step.
Use that flexibility to your advantage, and choose the model that delivers the right balance of performance, predictability, and cost for your specific flow.
For model benchmarks and live testing guidance, see the Regal Developer Docs.
Latest Blog Posts
.png)
.png)
Anatomy of an AI Voice: What Makes It Sound Human
This article outlines the core characteristics that influence how voice AI is perceived on live calls. From mechanical traits like speed and volume, to more emotional and conversational behaviors, we’re going to look at what those characteristics mean, why they matter, and how they impact your bottom line.
.png)
AI Voice Customization 101: Settings That Work Best
Learn how to configure your AI Voice Agent for real performance. This guide covers the most important voice settings in Regal, what ranges top brands use in production, and how adjusting speed, tone, and responsiveness impact cost, containment, and overall customer experience.
%20(1).png)
June 2025 Releases
June’s releases give you more control to test, improve, and scale AI agents—while also making life easier for human agent teams. From real-time debugging tools to capacity control and a floating Chrome extension, we’re unlocking faster workflows, better control, and stronger performance across the board.
.png)
Caller ID vs. CNAM vs. Branded Caller ID: What’s the Difference?
Caller ID, CNAM, and Branded Caller ID all help identify an incoming call and, therefore, increase call answer rates. Find out how they differ and how outbound phone sales teams can utilize each to reach prospects and customers effectively.
.png)
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
%20(1).webp)
.avif)
.png)
The Automated Phone System Revolution: Why 73% of Enterprises Are Getting It Wrong (And How to Get It Right)
Explore how automated phone systems are transforming enterprise communication strategies. Learn how to avoid common pitfalls, optimize customer journeys, and achieve ROI through strategic deployment across industries like healthcare, insurance, and education.
%20(1).png)
.png)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
How are Generative AI Voice Agents Different from AI Voice Assistants?
When it comes to comparing AI Agents vs. AI Assistants, Siri & Alexa handle simple tasks, but Gen AI Voice Agents—like Regal’s AI Phone Agent—drive real business impact with human-like conversations, automation, and seamless integration.
.webp)
.webp)
%20(1).webp)
7 Best Use Cases for AI Voice Agents in Your Contact Center
As AI technology continues to evolve, the use cases for AI Voice Agents in contact centers will only increase. By answering these six key questions, you can identify where AI agents fit best today in your contact center and plan for future integrations.
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
%20(1).webp)
.webp)
%202.webp)
AI Agents for Education: 8 Use Cases for More Meaningful Student Outcomes
AI Agents for Education are transforming student engagement—boosting enrollment, improving retention, and making support more human. Discover 8 game-changing use cases that free up your staff while delivering better student outcomes.
Regal Named One of Forbes America’s Best Startup Employers 2025!
Regal is officially one of Forbes America’s Best Startup Employers 2025, ranking #164 out of 500. This recognition is a testament to our incredible team, our innovative work culture, and our unwavering commitment to advancing AI technology.
AI in Education: The Future of Student Engagement & Enrollment
AI in education is helping to streamline admissions, automate student engagement, and enhance higher ed outreach. Discover key education technology trends to boost enrollment and learn why automated student engagement tools are the future.
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.avif)
.avif)
5 Ways to Improve Agent Productivity & 5X Outbound Performance
In this blog, we share tips to improve agent productivity for handling high volumes of calls, whether it's inbound support teams or outbound sales teams. The guiding principle is simple — focus your agents on tasks that absolutely requires their attention, and automate everything else.
.avif)
8 Strategies to Improve Call Answer Rates by 40%
Discover 8 proven strategies to improve call answer rates by 40%. Learn how personalized outreach, Branded Caller ID, and AI-driven solutions can transform your outbound contact center and boost engagement. Increase your call answer rates and drive more revenue today!
.avif)
.avif)
Insurtech Insights: How Regal Drives Revenue Across the Policy Lifecycle
Our Co-Founder & CTO, Rebecca Greene, delivered a presentation at the recent Insurtech Insights NYC 2024 event about how insurance brands can meet the moment of global uncertainty and rebuild trust by turning untapped customer data into personalized, revenue driving conversations across the Policyholder lifecycle.
.avif)
Treat your customers like royalty
Ready to see Regal in action?
Book a personalized demo.
Thank you! Click here if you are not redirected.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
